How Tesorai Works

How Tesorai Search gets more identifications without cutting corners on error control — the scoring model, the FDR methodology, and how it handles both DDA and DIA, in one place.
Read time:
5-minute read
Benchmark opens on
GitHub
ON THIS PAGE

Now peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Molecular Biology (2026).

Tesorai Search is built to be fast, scalable, and easy to use, without asking you to trade off rigor to get there.

Effortless scalability

Handle projects of any size without worrying about local computing limitations. Tesorai Search runs in the cloud, not on a single computer, so instead of processing samples one at a time on a lab workstation, it spins up as many machines as needed to analyze every file at once. Reprocessing 250 immunopeptidomics files, a task that could take days locally, finishes in under 45 minutes on our platform — and that speed holds as your data grows, rather than slowing down.

Enhanced collaboration

Cloud-based processing means analyses can be easily shared with your collaborators.

Easy to use

Upload raw data, set a couple of parameters, and you're good to go. No complex software installations or high-performance hardware needed. Whereas some tools require tuning dozens of parameters (precursor and fragment mass tolerance, isotopes, RT window, etc), we automatically adapt defaults to the instrument being used.

One model, one score

The single most important thing to understand about Tesorai Search is that the extra identifications do not come from a looser threshold on a familiar score. They come from a different score — one produced by a single model that looks at the entire spectrum and the candidate peptide together and asks one question: does this spectrum really come from this peptide?

Concretely, the model lays out the chemistry of the candidate peptide, reads the entire measured spectrum, and judges the agreement between the two — comparing the predicted fragment layout against the measured peaks and weighing how well the intensities and positions line up to produce a single score.

Same matched fragment ions can score very differently depending on intensity and spectral context
The model reads intensities and context across the whole spectrum — not just which fragment ions are present.

Built-in, honest FDR control

Most modern tools ask their decoys to do two jobs at once: teach a classifier what "wrong" looks like, and estimate the error rate. We ask decoys to do only one. The part of Tesorai Search that decides whether a spectrum matches a peptide never sees a decoy — decoys are held back entirely for measuring the error rate afterward, so the estimate stays independent of the model that produced the score.

Conventional rescoring uses decoys for both training and FDR estimation; Tesorai reserves decoys for FDR estimation only
Conventional rescoring asks decoys to train the classifier and estimate FDR. Tesorai reserves decoys for FDR estimation only — they never train the model.

Built for both DDA and DIA

Traditional search engines are typically built for one acquisition strategy or the other. Tesorai Search supports both DDA and DIA on the same core methodology: a model pretrained once on hundreds of millions of real peptide-spectrum matches, and never trained on decoys. The DDA and DIA models are separate implementations tuned to their data — DDA scores individual spectra, DIA scores extracted chromatograms (XICs) — but they share the same underlying approach, so you get one consistent, high-confidence tool regardless of how your data was collected.

DDA and DIA are two model implementations sharing one pretrained, decoy-free methodology
Two implementations, one shared approach — pretrained once, never trained on decoys, for either acquisition type.

More peptides, honest error rates

Tesorai Search identifies, on average, 9% to 68% more peptides than other current search engines at a 1% FDR, comparing across four widely used tools, on seven independent datasets it never saw during training — peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Molecular Biology.

These gains hold up under scrutiny. Tested with an entrapment analysis — a foreign protein database spiked into the search, so any match to it is a guaranteed false positive — the measured error rate closely tracked the target FDR across thresholds from 0.1% to 10%, rather than falling arbitrarily below it. In other words, when Tesorai Search says 1% FDR, the observed error rate is close to 1%, not inflated, and not artificially conservative either.

How we handle protein inference

Protein inference in Tesorai Search follows standard, well-established methods — protein groups and razor-peptide assignment, the same approach used since the original MaxQuant inference model.

See how Tesorai Search compares

Tesorai identifies up to 68% more peptides than MaxQuant, FragPipe, PEAKS, and Proteome Discoverer — at the same 1% FDR, without match-between-runs.

Explore more resources

Technical explainers, publications, guides, and perspectives on proteomics data analysis and biological discovery.
View all resources

Building a Pan-Cancer Atlas of Therapeutic T Cell Targets

How NYU researchers used large-scale immunopeptidomics and AI-enabled peptide identification to identify 28,446 tumor-specific antigens and accelerate therapeutic target discovery.

Guangyuan (Frank) Li, PhD, NYU Langone Health

FDR, Match-Between-Runs, and Immunopeptidomics: A Plain-Language Guide

Three concepts that determine whether you can trust your proteomics results — and what to look for when evaluating any search engine.

What is Proteomics? A guide to Mass Spectrometry, Search Engines, and Data Acquisition

From how proteins are measured to why the software that analyzes the data matters as mush as the instrument that generates it.